Читать книгу - "Тесты для оценки персонала: Как принимать кадровые решения на основе данных, а не ощущений - Юрий Шатров"

168. Mahar, D., Cologon, J., & Duck, J. (1995). Response strategies when faking personality questionnaires in a vocational selection setting. Personality and Individual Differences, 18(5), 605–609.

Mahar, D., et al. (2006). Stereotyping as a response strategy when faking personality questionnaires. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(7), 1375–1386.

Какое будущее у тестов

169. Barends, A. J., & de Vries, R. E. (2024). Developing and improving personality inventories using generative artificial intelligence: The psychometric properties of a short HEXACO scale developed using ChatGPT 4.0. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1–7 (advance online publication).

Walton, K. E., & Anguiano-Carrasco, C. (2024). Generating social and emotional skill items: Humans vs. ChatGPT.

Hernandez, I., & Nie, W. (2023). The AI–IP: Minimizing the guesswork of personality scale item development through artificial intelligence. Personnel Psychology, 76(4), 1011–1035.

170. Krumm, S., Thiel, A. M., Reznik, N., Freudenstein, J. P., Schäpers, P., & Mussel, P. (2024). Creating a psychological test in a few seconds: Can ChatGPT develop a psychometrically sound situational judgment test? European Journal of Psychological Assessment (онлайн-публикация).

171. Kares, F., König, C. J., Bergs, R., Protzel, C., & Langer, M. (2023). Trust in hybrid human-automated decision-support. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 31(3), 388–402.

172. Fan, J., Sun, T., Liu, J., Zhao, T., Zhang, B., Chen, Z., et al., & Hack, E. (2023). How well can an AI chatbot infer personality? Examining psychometric properties of machine-inferred personality scores. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(8), 1277–1299.

173. Hickman, L., Tay, L., & Woo, S. E. (2024). Are automated video interviews smart enough? Behavioral modes, reliability, validity, and bias of machine learning cognitive ability assessments. Journal of Applied Psychology (онлайн-публикация).

174. Hickman, L., Herde, C. N., Lievens, F., & Tay, L. (2023). Automatic scoring of speeded interpersonal assessment center exercises via machine learning: Initial psychometric evidence and practical guidelines. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 31(2), 225–239.

Hickman, L., Liff, J., Rottman, C., & Calderwood, C. (2024). The effects of the training sample size, ground truth reliability, and NLP method on language-based automatic interview scores’ psychometric properties. Organizational Research Methods (онлайн-публикация).

175. Hickman, L., Dunlop, P. D., & Wolf, J. L. (2024). The performance of large language models on quantitative and verbal ability tests: Initial evidence and implications for unproctored high-stakes testing. International Journal of Selection and Assessment (онлайн-публикация).

Hickman, L. (2025). All your base are belong to us: The urgent reality of unproctored testing in the age of LLMs. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 33(2) (онлайн-публикация).

176. Фирсов А. Как российские бренды лидируют на рынке труда // Ведомости. — 2024. — 23 окт.

177. Шмелёв А. Г. Практическая тестология: Тестирование в образовании, прикладной психологии и управлении персоналом: Практическое руководство. — М.: Маска, 2013. — 688 с.

178. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification”. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 9–15).

179. Ramos-Villagrasa, P. J., Fernández-del-Río, E., & Castro, Á. (2022). Game-related assessments for personnel selection: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.

Georgiou, K., & Nikolaou, I. (2020). Are applicants in favor of traditional or gamified assessment methods? Exploring applicant reactions towards a gamified selection method. Computers in Human Behavior, 109, 106356.

Приложение 1. Как зарождались тесты в оценке персонала

180. Cattell, J. M. (1890). Mental tests and measurements. Mind, 15(59), 373–381.

181. Kovacs, K., & Pléh, C. (2023). William Stern: The relevance of his program of ‘differential psychology’ for contemporary intelligence measurement and research. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), Article 41.

182. Gibby, R. E., & Zickar, M. J. (2008). A history of the early days of personality testing in American industry: An obsession with adjustment. History of Psychology, 11(3), 164–184.

183. Yoakum C. S., Yerkes R. M. (eds.). Army Mental Tests. — New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1920. — P. 4.

184. Kornhauser, A. W. (1930). Industrial psychology in England, Germany and the United States. Personnel Journal, 8, 421–434.

185. Armstrong, H. G. (1939). Principles and practice of aviation medicine. Williams & Wilkins.

186. Vernon, P. E., & Parry, J. B. (1949). Personnel selection in the British forces. University of London Press.

187. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.

188. American Psychological Association. (1954). Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques. Psychological Bulletin, 51(2, Pt. 2), 201–238.

189. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302.

190. Lord, F. M. (1952). A theory of test scores (Psychometric Monograph No. 7). Psychometric Society.

191. Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Danish Institute for Educational Research.

192. Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Addison-Wesley.

193. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1977). Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(5), 529–540.

194. Guion, R. M., & Gottier, R. F. (1965). Validity of personality measures in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 18(2), 135–164.

195. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262–274.

196. Motowidlo, S. J., Dunnette, M. D., & Carter, G. W. (1990). An alternative selection procedure: The low-fidelity simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(6), 640–647.

197. Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O. S., & Drasgow, F. (2005). An IRT approach to constructing and scoring pairwise preference items involving stimuli on different dimensions: The multi-unidimensional pairwise-preference model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29(3), 184–203.

Brown, A., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2011). Item response modeling of forced-choice questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71(3), 460–502.

198. Нечаев А. П. Руководство к экспериментально-психологическому исследованию детей дошкольного и школьного возраста. Вып. 1. — М., 1925.

199. Тесты: теория и практика: сб. / под рук. П. П. Блонского. — М.: Работник просвещения, 1928–1930. — Вып. 1–3.

200. Василейский С. М., Гайворовский А. А., Вержболович С. М. Основной комплекс тестов для испытаний технической одарённости. — Минск, 1929.

201. Гагарин Ю. А., Лебедев В. И. Психология и космос. — М.: Молодая гвардия, 1968. — 208 с.

202. Бернштейн М. С. К методике составления и проверки тестов // Вопросы психологии. — 1968. — №1. —