Читать книгу - "Постчеловек: глоссарий - Рози Брайдотти"

Haraway, D. (2008), When Species Meet, Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.

Haraway, D. (2012a) SF, Speculative Fabulation and String Figures, Berlin: Hatje Cantz.

Haraway, D. (2012b), ‘Cosmopolitical Critters: Companion Species, SF, and Staying with the Trouble’, John Coffin Memorial Lecture, English Studies in association with the IES conference ‘Cosmpolitan Animals’, 26–27 October 2012, London, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fMIm0SeRRY4#t=27 [accessed 7 February 2017].

Haraway, D. (2013), ‘SF: Science Fiction, Speculative Fabulation, String Figures, So Far’, Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology, 3, http://adanewmedia.org/2013/11/issue3-haraway/ [accessed 4 May 2016].

Haraway, D. (2014), ‘SF: String Figures, Multispecies Muddles, Staying with the Trouble’, public lecture at the University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

Haraway D. (2015a), ‘Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making Kin’, Environmental Humanities, 6: 159–65.

Haraway, D. (2015b) ‘Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Chthulhocene. Donna Haraway in conversation with Martha Kenney’, in H. Davis and E. Turpin (eds), Art in the Anthropocene: Encounters Among Aesthetics, Politics, Environments and Epistemologies, 255–70, London: Open Humanities Press.

Haraway, D. and T. Goodeve (2000), How Like a Leaf, New York: Routledge.

Haraway, D. and N. Lykke (2004), ‘Cyborgs, Coyotes, and Dogs: A Kinship of Feminist Figurations and There are Always More Things Going on Than You Thought! Methodologies as Thinking Technologies’, in D. Haraway, The Haraway Reader, 321–341, New York: Routledge.

Haraway, D. and L. Nakamura, L. (2003), ‘Prospects for a Materialist Informatics: An Interview with Donna Haraway’, Electronic Book Review, 30 August, http://www.electronicbookreview.com/thread/technocapitalism/interview [accessed 1 March 2016].

Haraway, D., N. Ishikawa, S. F. Gilbert, K. Olwig, A. L. Tsing and N. Bubandt (2015), ‘Anthropologists Are Talking – About the Anthropocene’, Ethnos, 81(4): 1–30.

Harding, S. (1986), The Science Question in Feminism, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

Harding, S. (2004), ‘Introduction: Standpoint Theory as a Site of Political, Philosophic, and Scientific Debate’, in S. Harding (ed.), The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies, 1–15, New York: Routledge.

Harding, S. (2008), Sciences from Below: Feminisms, Postcolonialities, and Modernities, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Hardt, M. (2007), ‘Foreword: What Affects Are Good For’, in P. Ticineto Clough and J. Halley (eds), The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social, ix—xiii, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Hardt, M. and A. Negri (2004), Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire, London: Penguin.

Hardt, M. and A. Negri (2009), Commonwealth, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Harel, D. and Rosner, R. (1992), Algorithmics, Reading: Addison-Wesley.

Haritaworn, J., A. Kuntsman and S. Posocco (2014), ‘Introduction’, in J. Haritaworn, A. Kuntsman and S. Posocco (eds), Queer Necropolitics, New York: Routledge.

Harman, G. (2009), Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics, Melbourne: re.press.

Harman, G. (2010a), Towards Speculative Realism: Essays and Lectures, Ropley: Zero Books.

Harney, S. and F. Moten (2013), The Undercommons: Fugitive Planning and Black Study, Wivenhoe, New York and Port Watson: Minor Compositions.

Harrison, R. P. (1992), Forests: The Shadow of Civilization, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hartley, J. (2003), ‘The Frequencies of Public Writing: Tomb, Tome and Time as Technologies of the Public’, in H. Jenkins and T. Thorburn (eds), Democracy and New Media, 247–269, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Harvey, D. (2012), Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution, New York: Verso Books.

Hasson, U., O. Landesman, B. Knappmeyer, I. Vallines, N. Rubin and D. J. Heeger (2008), ‘Neurocinematics: The Neuroscience of Film’, Projections, 2(1): 1–26.

Hauptman, D. and W. Neidich (eds) (2010), Cognitive Architecture: From Bio-politics to Noo-politics, Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.

Hauser, J. (2003), ‘Genes, Geneies, Genes’, in L’Art Biotech Catalogue, Trezelan: Filigranes Editions.

Hawkins, G. (2006), The Ethics of Waste: How We Relate to Rubbish, Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.

Hay, J., S. Hall and L. Grossberg, L. (2013), ‘Interview with Stuart Hall’, Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 10(1): 10–33.

Hayles, N. K. (1993), ‘The Materiality of Informatics’, Configurations 1(1): 147–70.

Hayles, N. K. (1997), ‘The Posthuman Body: Inscription and Incorporation in Galatea 2.2 and Snow Crash’, Configurations, 2: 241–66.

Hayles, N. K. (1999), How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hayles, N. K. (2002), Writing Machines, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.

Hayles, N. K. (2005), My Mother Was a Computer: Digital Subjects and Literary Texts, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hayles, N. K. (2006), ‘Unfinished Work: From Cyborg to Cognisphere’, Theory, Culture & Society, 23(7–8): 159–66.

Hayles, N. K. (2012), How We Think: Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hayles, N. K. (2014), ‘Cognition Everywhere: The Rise of the Cognitive Nonconscious and the Costs of Consciousness’, New Literary History, 45(2): 199–220.

Hays, M. K. (1981), ‘Critical Architecture Between Culture and Form’, Perspecta, 21: 14–29.

Hayward, E. (2010), ‘Spider City Sex’, Women and Performance, 20(3): 225–51.

Hayward, E. and J. Weinstein (2015), ‘Introduction: Tranimalities in the Age of Trans* Life’, TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 2(2): 195–208.

Heidegger, M. (2012), ‘Positionality’, in Bremen and Freiburg Lectures: Insight Into What Is and Basic Principles of Thinking, 23–43, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Heinz, K. (1983), Entwurf einer Philosophie des Wir: Schule des alternativen Denkens, Bochum: Germinal Verlag.

Heise, U. K. (2008), Sense of Place and Sense of Planet: The Environmental Imagination of the Global, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Heise, U. K. (2011), ‘The Posthuman Turn: Rewriting Species in Recent American Literature’, in С. F. Levander and R. S. Levine (eds), A Companion to American Literary Studies, 454–69, Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.

Hemmings, С. (2011), Why Stories Matter: The Political Grammar of Feminist Theory, Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.

Henry, M. (2015), ‘Parades, Parties and Pests: Contradictions of Everyday Life in Peacekeeping Economies’, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 1–19.

Herbrechter, S. (2011), ‘Shakespeare Ever After: Posthumanism and Shakespeare’, in A. Hofele and S. Laque (eds),

Humankinds: The Renaissance and Its Anthropologies, 261–78, Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.

Herbrechter, S. (2013), Posthumanism: A Critical Analysis, London: Bloomsbury.

Herbrechter, S. and I. Callus (eds) (2005), Cy-Borges: Memories of the Posthuman in the Work of Jorge Luis Borges, Lewisburg: Bucknell University